AML

profit lever profit-driven cost of disagreeing models

Fewer disagreeing models → net profit increased

One shared model cuts the process cost of rebuilding the same thing twice. That saved cost is C$ ↓ at the process ring, and it rolls straight up through value and revenue to net profit increased.

NESTED PROFIT STREAM profit ⊃ revenue ⊃ value ⊃ process AML acts here profit revenue stream value stream process rework cost C$ ↓ cost of disagreeing models NetProfitIncreased every hour not spent reconciling models compounds here
Where AML actsrebuilding the same model twice, once per team, is a process cost — one shared gateway removes it
The deltaC$ minimized: the cost of disagreeing models collapses as every app is forced onto the same model
Where it landsthe saved process cost rolls up through value and revenue to net profit increased — no dollar figure invented

Profit lever chart · qualitative delta, grounded in AML's own claim · nests profit ⊃ revenue ⊃ value ⊃ process