Reduce the number of competing definitions for one concept
Measure: competing definitions per concept
One vocabulary, many owners.
A concept is owned by exactly one place and referenced everywhere else. Models, skills and corpora federate by reference rather than by copy, so a definition has a single home and every consumer reads the same one.
What it moves
Each outcome names the measure it moves and the direction it moves it — the value is stated as a measure, not as a claim.
Increase the share of references that resolve to an owner
Measure: resolvable reference share
Reduce the effort to adopt a shared concept in a new model
Measure: adoption effort
3
desired outcomes
4
mechanisms
3
AML solutions
Copied definitions are the beginning of two systems.
Once a definition is pasted into a second document it starts aging on its own schedule, and the two versions are indistinguishable until something breaks. Federation replaces the copy with an edge: the owner keeps the definition, and everyone else resolves it.
before
resolved
Each concept owns one skill directory holding its definition, its curated corpus and its evaluation. Membership is federated by link rather than duplication, so a fact line in a model resolves to the owning concept's directory. Raw authoritative sources stay separated from curated truth, so what a standard says and what ageni concluded from it never merge by accident.
- 1 One concept, one owning skill — a concept is never redefined by a consumer.
- 2 Extracted source material and curated conclusions live in separate layers of the corpus.
- 3 A model's fact lines resolve to the owning concept, so the graph is navigable in both directions.
- 4 A rule file defers to the skill that owns the concept whenever the two disagree.